What would be great is to have a system that doesn’t take any more desk space, looks cool, is highly functional, and can do multiple fader manipulation simultaneously. This may sound like a lot, but when the human brain can hear the difference of a 1/5th of a decibel, and there are more than 144 decibels from the bottom of a fader to the top at 24 bit – well, you get the idea.
Having physical faders is wonderful, but they come at a cost, and many times those faders are connected to an interface system which has only 128 increments top to bottom.
The general rule is what I mentioned above: you can get awesome functionality for a lot of money or spend a little money and get frustrated. We’ve experimented with several control surfaces including the Mackie Control surfaces, Avid C24 consoles, Avid Artist Mix varieties and others. It’s useless in the situation where you need to grab more than one fader at a time, and a mouse-fader combo requires you to spend more time going back and redoing work than a control surface with multiple faders does. Using a mouse to grab a fader is a total drag. It’s finessing busses and groups that is required – and that requires faders. In this article we’ll take a look at how their MTi2 has been working for us in Cinema Sound Studio B and if it’s right for you.Īlthough most of the work that goes into a mix takes place via moving key frames, once the bulk of the gross mixing is done, Slate Digital Raven MTi2
#Slate digital audio repair Pc#
Our friends at Slate Digital have devised an ingenious solution for both PC and Mac folks in the form of its Raven products. PC folks have had touch screen capabilities for their DAWs for years, while the good folks at Apple have chosen to disallow such functionality. Either they’re super useful but wildly expensive, or super affordable but not difficult to use. Control surfaces are difficult to choose.
0 kommentar(er)
